Druckversion
Instrument Type: 
Questionnaire
Year: 
2010
Language: 
English
Educational Sector: 
secondary
higher
vocational
corporate
adult
non-formal
informal
other
Learning Technology: 
for analog and digital learning environments
Number of Items: 
18
Number of Dimensions: 
5
Response Format: 
10 cm bi-polar scale from 0 (fully disagree) to 10 (fully agree)
Learning Indicators : 
cognitive processes
affective processes
Reliability: 
Cronbachs α: Fairness: Cronbach’s α = .80 Usefulness: Cronbach’s α = .82 Acceptance: Cronbach’s α = .69 Willingness to Improve; Cronbach’s α = .82 Affect: Cronbach’s α = .81
Validated: 
Yes
Notes (References): 

Strijbos, J. W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2010). Peer feedback content and sender’s competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback and efficiency? Learning and Instruction, 20, 291-303.

Feedback perceptions Scale

© Universität Duisburg-Essen | -
admin@mediendidaktik.de